Tuesday, December 31, 2019

Blog #2 Artists Pushing For Change


Throughout the decades, art has been a very crucial part of Cuba’s culture and society. It has given the people a way to express themselves and given them a voice. Before the Revolution the art scene was widely diverse with influence from multiple cultures such as African, European, North and South American. Afterwards though, things became divided when some artists decided to leave Cuba in efforts to pursue their career in other countries where they had more access to dollars. Those who stayed had to create their art in limitation due to the censorship that came with being sponsored by the government. It’s sad to see how their art had gone from such expression and recognition of the different cultures present on the island to only being allowed to create art that followed along with the ideals of the government.
One of the artists mentioned in the videos, Wifredo Lam, I found interesting because of his bravery to create art that went against the social norm at the time. Wifredo was of Chinese and African decent but had not gotten in touch with his ancestral roots until he moved to Spain to study art. Once he returned back to Cuba in the 1940’s and saw how the blacks were being treated, he began painting politically and wanted to “awaken a sense of injustice in people,” as described by his son. It wasn’t common for people to admit that they were of African or Chinese descent and how he so fearlessly allowed his ancestry to influence how he painted is inspiring.
Another artist that caught my eye was Fidelio Ponce de Leon because of the truth he told in each of his paintings. His artwork told the story of how life actually was for most Cuban citizens. It depicted the sickness, poverty, and alienation that was prevalent in the 1930’s. He had an unruly life just like everyone else that included a desperate economic situation. He painted how he felt and that went along with how many others felt too, it was said to represent the national mood at the time. His piece titled “Niños” is a clear example of that. It was thought that children were associated with beauty and hope and when Fidelio painted a child in nature that shows a facial expression of clear sadness, it offered a very contrasting view to some of the other artwork.
An art piece described in the video Cuba: The Art Revolution created by the duo Los Carpinteros took a very direct route to say how they really felt about the Cuban government. The lighthouse is supposed to represent power in the country and is never on its side as that reflects suffering. Yet this particular piece represented a fall in power and that change needs to happen in the Cuban government. I was very surprised that it could be shown considering how strict the laws were about defying the government and all that the Revolution stood for.
On the topic of government censorship, the article about criminalization of the arts in Cuba was shocking to me how brutal it had become and this was just last year. The Cuban government had taken away so much of what made the arts scene a way for people to express themselves with Decree 349. Things like reggaeton were banned from radios and stores which was a very popular genre of music among the people. Life is so different in that respect compared to the United States which is why it’s so shocking to me that people have to go to such extremes in order to have free speech and freedom of expression in their art. For example, at one of the protest performances, artists intended to cover themselves in human excrement as a symbol of artists’ treatment by the government.

Do you think that artists’ efforts like Fidelio Ponce de Leon or Los Carpinteros pieces made an impact on the Cuban people to push for change? And do you believe that Decree 349 will continue to be upheld regardless of how many protests have been occurring in defiance of it?

3 comments:

  1. Hi Allie -
    There is still a lot of time to occur before I believe there will be change in the art world for Cuban's. I think that Los Carpinteros pieces will make a push to change due to how they are are surrounded around politics. When you talk about the lighthouse created by Los Carpinteros it is a piece directed at needing a change in the government which will get more a response by the Cuban government. Artist like Fidelio Ponce de Leon paint the truth and like you said it shows the sickness, poverty and alienation during the 1930's. I do not think the Cuban government cares that much about what was happening in the past. The government does not allow you to have freedom of speech and Los Capinteros use their art work to get their freedom of speech. I think more artist will have to make subtle art with strong political opinions in them for a change to really occur.
    As for Decree 349 I think it will eventually be removed but for now it will stay. Attending protest take away from the artist creating art or music. I think the main reason Decree 349 was put into place was for the government to get main profit from the artist just like they do on everything else. The art world is a booming market for Cuban people and the government wasn't getting a share of their profit. With the Decree 349 they can make art and perform with no profit or sell under the government standards so the government gets a cut of their earnings. I agree with you that is is so shocking between the difference of freedom of speech and expression that we have in the United States.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey Allie,
    I do think the work of artists like Fidelio Ponce de Leon and Los Carpinteros are making an impact on the Cuban people not only with their rallying political messages and call for change, but also the reception they have received globally. Los Carpinteros, for example, are selling in the US and even have exhibitions in famous museums like the Museum of Modern Art in New York. This fame must be inspiring to further Cuban influence and spread change. I believe the story of Los Caprinteros and how they made a life for themselves can also prompt a push for change: in the Frontline interview with Natasha del Toro she talks about how they started out creating their art from recycled and used materials because they were so poor. If these artists can make such a name for themselves and call out a broken system- why can't other Cuban citizens? I do agree with Natalie that Decree 349 will be upheld, at least for now. I think as Cuban artists get more and more recognition it will be harder for the government to censor them because of the outside market. In the article "Cuban artists rise up" it is mentioned how during the special period artists were allowed to sell art so Cuba could remain a cultural superpower. I believe, though the special period is over, this still holds true: Cuba, including the government, does not want to diminish their label of art.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I absolutely believe that Decree 349 will be upheld for the time being. Raul Castro was loyal to his brother's regime and so is the new leader of Cuba. The current government is still trying to uphold communism and is detaining artists to use their art for a message, and therefore anyone in opposition to Decree 349 risks being detained. I'm sure many who have participated in the protests have been arrested as protesting a Decree is in direct opposition to the government. Although there are a lot of people from outside Cuba talking about the Decree and protesting it, Cuba won't care about these people as they are not part of the country, and Cubans do not have access to the media to see others talking about it. Decree 349 is Cuba's way of censoring the art as best they can, because they can profit off of it. I strongly believe another goal of the Decree is to allow the government to have an economic handle on another industry in the country. Do you believe artists will begin to leave the country? Do you think artists will continue to make anti-communism pieces, and will these encourage others to leave the country too if the government doesn't roll back the decree?

    ReplyDelete